| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with high-grade glioma, a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-017-4789-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bart R. J. van Dijken, Peter Jan van Laar, Gea A. Holtman, Anouk van der Hoorn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,577
of 5,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,644
of 326,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.