Title |
Taste in Parkinson’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00415-014-7518-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Paola Cecchini, Alfonso Fasano, Federico Boschi, Francesco Osculati, Michele Tinazzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 23% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,811
of 4,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,169
of 254,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.