↓ Skip to main content

Lost in translation? Interpretations of the probability phrases used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in China and the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Lost in translation? Interpretations of the probability phrases used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in China and the UK
Published in
Climatic Change, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0975-1
Authors

Adam J. L. Harris, Adam Corner, Juemin Xu, Xiufang Du

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 46 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 22%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Psychology 9 18%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,041,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,154
of 6,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,703
of 226,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#85
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.