You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coordinated Effects of Sequence Variation on DNA Binding, Chromatin Structure, and Transcription
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1242463 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helena Kilpinen, Sebastian M. Waszak, Andreas R. Gschwind, Sunil K. Raghav, Robert M. Witwicki, Andrea Orioli, Eugenia Migliavacca, Michaël Wiederkehr, Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus, Nikolaos I. Panousis, Alisa Yurovsky, Tuuli Lappalainen, Luciana Romano-Palumbo, Alexandra Planchon, Deborah Bielser, Julien Bryois, Ismael Padioleau, Gilles Udin, Sarah Thurnheer, David Hacker, Leighton J. Core, John T. Lis, Nouria Hernandez, Alexandre Reymond, Bart Deplancke, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 35 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 34 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 31% |
| Researcher | 125 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 271 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 112 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 4% |
| Unknown | 61 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#561,410
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#12,981
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,505
of 226,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#171
of 855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.