| Title |
The BARRIERS scale -- the barriers to research utilization scale: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerstin Nilsson Kajermo, Anne-Marie Boström, David S Thompson, Alison M Hutchinson, Carole A Estabrooks, Lars Wallin |
| Abstract |
A commonly recommended strategy for increasing research use in clinical practice is to identify barriers to change and then tailor interventions to overcome the identified barriers. In nursing, the BARRIERS scale has been used extensively to identify barriers to research utilization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 26% |
| Unknown | 38 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 14% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,476,216
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,088
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,486
of 97,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.