↓ Skip to main content

Fish gut microbiota analysis differentiates physiology and behavior of invasive Asian carp and indigenous American fish

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fish gut microbiota analysis differentiates physiology and behavior of invasive Asian carp and indigenous American fish
Published in
The ISME Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/ismej.2013.181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Ye, Jon Amberg, Duane Chapman, Mark Gaikowski, Wen-Tso Liu

Abstract

Gut microbiota of invasive Asian silver carp (SVCP) and indigenous planktivorous gizzard shad (GZSD) in Mississippi river basin were compared using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Analysis of more than 440 000 quality-filtered sequences obtained from the foregut and hindgut of GZSD and SVCP revealed high microbial diversity in these samples. GZSD hindgut (GZSD_H) samples (n=23) with >7000 operational taxonomy units (OTUs) exhibited the highest alpha-diversity indices followed by SVCP foregut (n=15), GZSD foregut (n=9) and SVCP hindgut (SVCP_H) (n=24). UniFrac distance-based non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis showed that the microbiota of GZSD_H and SVCP_H were clearly separated into two clusters: samples in the GZSD cluster were observed to vary by sampling location and samples in the SVCP cluster by sampling date. NMDS further revealed distinct microbial community between foregut to hindgut for individual GZSD and SVCP. Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were detected as the predominant phyla regardless of fish or gut type. The high abundance of Cyanobacteria observed was possibly supported by their role as the fish's major food source. Furthermore, unique and shared OTUs and OTUs in each gut type were identified, three OTUs from the order Bacteroidales, the genus Bacillariophyta and the genus Clostridium were found significantly more abundant in GZSD_H (14.9-22.8%) than in SVCP_H (0.13-4.1%) samples. These differences were presumably caused by the differences in the type of food sources including bacteria ingested, the gut morphology and digestion, and the physiological behavior between GZSD and SVCP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 284 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 20%
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 55 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 139 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 12%
Environmental Science 22 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 66 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2018.
All research outputs
#928,042
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#337
of 3,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,219
of 224,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#4
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.