↓ Skip to main content

Development of the open‐source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development of the open‐source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad
Published in
Medical Physics, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/mp.12251
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report on the development of the open-source cross-platform radiation treatment planning toolkit matRad and its comparison against validated treatment planning systems. The toolkit enables three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for photons, scanned protons and scanned carbon ions. matRad is entirely written in Matlab and is freely available online. It re-implements well-established algorithms employing a modular and sequential software design to model the entire treatment planning workflow. It comprises core functionalities to import DICOM data, to calculate and optimize dose as well as a graphical user interface for visualization. matRad dose calculation algorithms (for carbon ions this also includes the computation of the relative biological effect) are compared against dose calculation results originating from clinically approved treatment planning systems. We observe three-dimensional γ-analysis pass rates ≥ 99.67% for all three radiation modalities utilizing a distance to agreement of 2mm and a dose difference criterion of 2%. The computational efficiency of matRad is evaluated in a treatment planning study considering three different treatment scenarios for every radiation modality. For photons, we measure total run times of 145 s - 1260 s for dose calculation and fluence optimization combined considering 4-72 beam orientations and 2608 - 13597 beamlets. For charged particles, we measure total run times of 63 s -993 s for dose calculation and fluence optimization combined considering 9963 - 45574 pencil beams. Using a CT and dose grid resolution of 0.3 cm(3) requires a memory consumption of 1.59GB - 9.07GB and 0.29GB - 17.94GB for photons and charged particles, respectively. The dosimetric accuracy, computational performance and open-source character of matRad encourages a future application of matRad for both educational and research purposes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Master 19 8%
Other 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 82 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 65 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 10%
Engineering 20 9%
Computer Science 7 3%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 95 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,235,738
of 32,004,021 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#557
of 9,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,502
of 343,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#10
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,004,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.