↓ Skip to main content

Clinical presentations, risk factors, treatment and outcomes in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis: a single-center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Clinical presentations, risk factors, treatment and outcomes in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis: a single-center experience
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11239-016-1337-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Klute, Ersilia M. DeFilippis, Kelissa Shillingford, John Chapin, Maria T. DeSancho

Abstract

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon form of venous thrombosis. Management can be challenging due to underlying conditions, increased bleeding risk, and lack of evidence from clinical trials. We sought to characterize the presentation and management of patients with SVT at a large tertiary hospital. A total of 43 patients' electronic medical records were reviewed. Median age at diagnosis was 43 (18-71). Sixteen patients had isolated portal vein thrombosis (37.2 %), and 16 (37.2 %) had thrombosis involving multiple splanchnic veins. Abdominal pain was the most common clinical presentation (67.4 %). Thrombophilia was present in 18 patients (41.9 %), nine had underlying liver disease (20.9 %) and seven had inflammatory bowel disease (16.3 %). Thirty-nine (90.7 %) patients were treated with anticoagulation, and 11(25.6 %) of these patients underwent interventional procedures. Thirty (69.8 %) patients remained on indefinite anticoagulation. Results of follow-up imaging at least 1 month after diagnosis were available for 29 patients; imaging showed chronic, stable thrombosis in 14 patients (48.3 %), resolution of thrombosis in 13 patients (44.8 %) and asymptomatic progression in two patients (6.9 %). Recurrent thrombosis occurred in four patients (9.3 %). Major bleeding occurred in eight patients who received anticoagulation (18.6 %), including fatal subdural hematoma in one patient. In this cohort of patients managed by hematologists and gastroenterologists, the majority of patients were treated with anticoagulation. Interventional procedures were higher than in previously reported series. Our study strongly supports the interdisciplinary management of splanchnic venous thrombosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Other 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,412,387
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#877
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,977
of 398,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.