You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study about factors that compose a group of aquatic insects in swimming pool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.7211/jjsrt.38.103 |
| Authors |
Masato MORIKAWA, Tatsuaki KOBAYASHI, Akihito AIZAWA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,260,500
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#7
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,101
of 250,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them