↓ Skip to main content

Borderline Personality Disorder and Chronic Pain: A Practical Approach to Evaluation and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Borderline Personality Disorder and Chronic Pain: A Practical Approach to Evaluation and Treatment
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11916-013-0350-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Kalira, Glenn J. Treisman, Michael R. Clark

Abstract

Patients with chronic pain present a spectrum of complexity that can be overwhelming for the individual practitioner. These patients require thoughtful care and a comprehensive treatment plan. This complexity should be acknowledged, not avoided, and the patient should be engaged, not shunned. A practical approach will assist in developing expertise and proceeding empathically. The presence of a superimposed personality disorder significantly increases the difficulty of caring for these patients. Studies investigating the prevalence of borderline personality disorder in patients with chronic pain averaged 30 %, highlighting the importance of being able to effectively treat this patient population. Appropriate management of these patients should focus on a collaboration to practice productive behaviors despite intense emotional distress. Longitudinal research provides a foundation for an optimistic prognosis that can be enhanced with this rehabilitative approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 24 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,394,135
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#485
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,600
of 196,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.