↓ Skip to main content

Function of lncRNAs and approaches to lncRNA-protein interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Function of lncRNAs and approaches to lncRNA-protein interactions
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11427-013-4553-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

JuanJuan Zhu, HanJiang Fu, YongGe Wu, XiaoFei Zheng

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which represent a new frontier in molecular biology, play important roles in regulating gene expression at epigenetic, transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. More and more lncRNAs have been found to play important roles in normal cell physiological activities, and participate in the development of varieties of tumors and other diseases. Previously, we have only been able to determine the function of lncRNAs through multiple mechanisms, including genetic imprinting, chromatin remodeling, splicing regulation, mRNA decay, and translational regulation. Application of technological advances to research into the function of lncRNAs is extremely important. The major tools for exploring lncRNAs include microarrays, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), Northern blotting, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA interference (RNAi), RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP), chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP), crosslinking-immunopurification (CLIP), and bioinformatic prediction. In this review, we highlight the functions of lncRNAs, and advanced methods to research lncRNA-protein interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 20%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Computer Science 8 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,378,615
of 23,847,468 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#292
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,579
of 211,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,847,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them