↓ Skip to main content

Mediators in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Severe Health Anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mediators in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Severe Health Anxiety
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Hedman, Erik Andersson, Gerhard Andersson, Nils Lindefors, Mats Lekander, Christian Rück, Brjánn Ljótsson

Abstract

According to the cognitive behavioral model of severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis) four central maintaining mechanisms are how the individual perceives the risk of disease and how negative its consequences would be, attention to bodily sensations, and intolerance of uncertainty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the mediating role of these putative mechanisms in Internet-delivered CBT for severe health anxiety. We analyzed data from an RCT where participants were randomized to Internet-delivered CBT (n=40) or to a control condition (n=41). Mediators and outcome, i.e. health anxiety, were assessed weekly throughout the treatment, enabling fulfillment of the criterion of temporal precedence of changes occurring in the mediator in relation to the outcome to be met. The results showed that reduced perceived risk of disease, less attention to bodily symptoms, and reduced intolerance of uncertainty significantly mediated improvement in health anxiety. The study supports the validity of the cognitive behavioral model of health anxiety. The findings have theoretical and clinical implications as they indicate processes that may be causally related to the improvements observed after CBT for health anxiety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#521,286
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,463
of 193,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,825
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#219
of 5,138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.