↓ Skip to main content

Lifestyle factors and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes mellitus: are the associations different from those in individuals without diabetes?

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Lifestyle factors and mortality risk in individuals with diabetes mellitus: are the associations different from those in individuals without diabetes?
Published in
Diabetologia, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-3074-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diewertje Sluik, Heiner Boeing, Kuanrong Li, Rudolf Kaaks, Nina Føns Johnsen, Anne Tjønneland, Larraitz Arriola, Aurelio Barricarte, Giovanna Masala, Sara Grioni, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Amalia Mattiello, Annemieke M. W. Spijkerman, Daphne L. van der A, Ivonne Sluijs, Paul W. Franks, Peter M. Nilsson, Marju Orho-Melander, Eva Fhärm, Olov Rolandsson, Elio Riboli, Dora Romaguera, Elisabete Weiderpass, Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo, Ute Nöthlings

Abstract

Thus far, it is unclear whether lifestyle recommendations for people with diabetes should be different from those for the general public. We investigated whether the associations between lifestyle factors and mortality risk differ between individuals with and without diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 44 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#258,031
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#160
of 5,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,102
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.