↓ Skip to main content

Concomitant Cholecystectomy During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Patients Is Not Justified: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Concomitant Cholecystectomy During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Patients Is Not Justified: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Obesity Surgery, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11695-012-0852-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rene Warschkow, Ignazio Tarantino, Kristjan Ukegjini, Ulrich Beutner, Ulrich Güller, Bruno M. Schmied, Sascha A. Müller, Bernd Schultes, Martin Thurnheer

Abstract

While LRYGB has become a cornerstone in the surgical treatment of morbidly obese patients, concomitant cholecystectomy during LRYGB remains a matter of debate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the rate and morbidity of subsequent cholecystectomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in obese patients. A meta-analysis was performed analyzing the rate and morbidity of subsequent cholecystectomy in patients who underwent LRYGB without concomitant cholecystectomy. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The rate of subsequent cholecystectomy was 6.8 % (95 % CI, 5.0-8.7 %) based on 6,048 obese patients who underwent LRYGB without concomitant cholecystectomy. The rate of subsequent cholecystectomy due to biliary colic or gallbladder dyskinesia was 5.3 %; due to cholecystitis, 1.0 %; choledocholithiasis, 0.2 %; and biliary pancreatitis, 0.2 %. The mortality after subsequent cholecystectomy was 0 % (95 % CI, 0-0.1 %). The surgery-related complication rate after subsequent cholecystectomy was 1.8 % (95 % CI, 0.7-3.4 %) resulting in a risk of 0.1 % (95 % CI, 0.03-0.3 %) to suffer from a cholecystectomy-related complication in patients undergoing LRYGB without concomitant cholecystectomy. A prophylactic concomitant cholecystectomy during LRYGB should be avoided in patients without cholelithiasis and exclusively be performed in patients with symptomatic biliary disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 30%