↓ Skip to main content

The mTOR effectors 4EBP1 and S6K2 are frequently coexpressed, and associated with a poor prognosis and endocrine resistance in breast cancer: a retrospective study including patients from the…

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,052)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mTOR effectors 4EBP1 and S6K2 are frequently coexpressed, and associated with a poor prognosis and endocrine resistance in breast cancer: a retrospective study including patients from the randomised Stockholm tamoxifen trials
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/bcr3557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elin Karlsson, Gizeh Pérez-Tenorio, Risul Amin, Josefine Bostner, Lambert Skoog, Tommy Fornander, Dennis C Sgroi, Bo Nordenskjöld, Anna-Lotta Hallbeck, Olle Stål

Abstract

mTOR and its downstream effectors the 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and the p70 ribosomal S6 kinases (S6K1 and S6K2) are frequently upregulated in breast cancer, and assumed to be driving forces in tumourigenesis, in close connection with oestrogen receptor (ER) networks. Here, we investigated these factors as clinical markers in five different cohorts of breast cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#66,913
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#12
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#411
of 224,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.