↓ Skip to main content

Herbivore trampling as an alternative pathway for explaining differences in nitrogen mineralization in moist grasslands

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Herbivore trampling as an alternative pathway for explaining differences in nitrogen mineralization in moist grasslands
Published in
Oecologia, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2484-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten Schrama, Pieter Heijning, Jan P. Bakker, Harm J. van Wijnen, Matty P. Berg, Han Olff

Abstract

Studies addressing the role of large herbivores on nitrogen cycling in grasslands have suggested that the direction of effects depends on soil fertility. Via selection for high quality plant species and input of dung and urine, large herbivores have been shown to speed up nitrogen cycling in fertile grassland soils while slowing down nitrogen cycling in unfertile soils. However, recent studies show that large herbivores can reduce nitrogen mineralization in some temperate fertile soils, but not in others. To explain this, we hypothesize that large herbivores can reduce nitrogen mineralization in loamy or clay soils through soil compaction, but not in sandy soils. Especially under wet conditions, strong compaction in clay soils can lead to periods of soil anoxia, which reduces decomposition of soil organic matter and, hence, N mineralization. In this study, we use a long-term (37-year) field experiment on a salt marsh to investigate the hypothesis that the effect of large herbivores on nitrogen mineralization depends on soil texture. Our results confirm that the presence of large herbivores decreased nitrogen mineralization rate in a clay soil, but not in a sandy soil. By comparing a hand-mown treatment with a herbivore-grazed treatment, we show that these differences can be attributed to herbivore-induced changes in soil physical properties rather than to above-ground biomass removal. On clay soil, we find that large herbivores increase the soil water-filled porosity, induce more negative soil redox potentials, reduce soil macrofauna abundance, and reduce decomposition activity. On sandy soil, we observe no changes in these variables in response to grazing. We conclude that effects of large herbivores on nitrogen mineralization cannot be understood without taking soil texture, soil moisture, and feedbacks through soil macrofauna into account.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 5 3%
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 160 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 26%
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 42%
Environmental Science 47 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,855
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,937
of 291,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.