↓ Skip to main content

Shattering Silence: Exploring Barriers to Disclosure for African American Sexual Assault Survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shattering Silence: Exploring Barriers to Disclosure for African American Sexual Assault Survivors
Published in
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, April 2010
DOI 10.1177/1524838010363717
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaquita Tillman, Thema Bryant-Davis, Kimberly Smith, Alison Marks

Abstract

National-, community-, and college-based studies have documented the high prevalence of sexual assault among African American women. Although African American women experience sexual assault at alarming rates, they are less likely to disclose or seek help in the aftermath of sexual assault. The purpose of this literature review is to provide a critique of the current literature examining the barriers to disclosure for African American women, such as intrapsychic factors, the damaging effect of an unsupportive response to initial disclosure, stigmatization of African American female sexuality, apprehension regarding racism, and racial loyalty. The authors provide a summary of the literature, gaps in current empirical studies, and needs for future study. Culturally relevant intervention recommendations are described. Finally, implications for sexual assault policy are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 44 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 31%
Psychology 48 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,456,080
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
#329
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,103
of 105,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them