↓ Skip to main content

Genomics in marine monitoring: New opportunities for assessing marine health status

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomics in marine monitoring: New opportunities for assessing marine health status
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J. Bourlat, Angel Borja, Jack Gilbert, Martin I. Taylor, Neil Davies, Stephen B. Weisberg, John F. Griffith, Teresa Lettieri, Dawn Field, John Benzie, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, Daniel P. Faith, Tim P. Bean, Matthias Obst

Abstract

This viewpoint paper explores the potential of genomics technology to provide accurate, rapid, and cost efficient observations of the marine environment. The use of such approaches in next generation marine monitoring programs will help achieve the goals of marine legislation implemented world-wide. Genomic methods can yield faster results from monitoring, easier and more reliable taxonomic identification, as well as quicker and better assessment of the environmental status of marine waters. A summary of genomic methods that are ready or show high potential for integration into existing monitoring programs is provided (e.g. qPCR, SNP based methods, DNA barcoding, microarrays, metagenetics, metagenomics, transcriptomics). These approaches are mapped to existing indicators and descriptors and a series of case studies is presented to assess the cost and added value of these molecular techniques in comparison with traditional monitoring systems. Finally, guidelines and recommendations are suggested for how such methods can enter marine monitoring programs in a standardized manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 459 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 119 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 19%
Student > Master 86 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 7%
Other 23 5%
Other 66 14%
Unknown 64 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192 40%
Environmental Science 97 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 4%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 85 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,147,604
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#1,161
of 9,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,143
of 213,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#23
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.