| Title |
Eustachian tuboplasty and shrinkage of ostial mucosa with new devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HNO, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00106-017-0346-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Di Rienzo Businco, A. Di Mario, M. Tombolini, A. Mattei, M. Lauriello |
| Abstract |
A new combined approach to Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) employing new minimally invasive devices is described. An anatomoclinical classification of ETD was conceived to allow correct categorization of patients and enable comparative studies to be performed. Herein, the authors report on their experience with a consecutive series of obstructive ETD patients treated by balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube using AERA (Acclarent, Menlo Park, CA, USA), combined with a quantic molecular resonance (QMR)-mediated rhinopharyngeal tubal ostial mucosa shrinkage technique with a dedicated "Mitto" hand piece (Telea, Sandrigo-Vicenza, Italy). A prospective study was conducted in 102 patients with ETD. Medical history, complete clinical ENT evaluation and oto-functional examinations were performed in all patients. In all cases, balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube was performed via the transnasal approach under video-endoscopic control. This was followed by decongestion of the torus tubarius and the inferior turbinate by QMR, with immediate shrinkage of the mucosa of the turbinate and a reduction of the prolapse of the mucosal plica on the tubal ostium. Comparison of pre- and postoperative oto-functional examinations revealed a significant improvement. The postoperative hearing symptoms were reduced in a statistically significant manner on the visual analog scale (VAS). It was possible to perform the postoperative "swallowing-opening-Toynbee-Valsalva" (SOTV) test in a significant percentage of cases compared to the preoperative test. The combined surgical procedure of balloon tubodilation with simultaneous QMR-mediated shrinkage of the tubal ostial mucosa and reduction of the posterior portion of the inferior turbinate was found to be an effective, safe, and complete treatment for tubal dysfunction in the majority of patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,451,039
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from HNO
#56
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,418
of 308,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HNO
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.