↓ Skip to main content

Determination of Umbilical Venous Catheter Tip Position With Radiograph

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of Umbilical Venous Catheter Tip Position With Radiograph
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31829f5efa
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam B. Hoellering, Pieter J. Koorts, David W. Cartwright, Mark W. Davies

Abstract

To compare the cardiac silhouette method with the vertebral body method in predicting the umbilical venous catheter tip position on ultrasound; to measure the length of the target zone for the umbilical venous catheter tip; and to determine the time taken for a neonatologist to ascertain position of the umbilical venous catheter tip with ultrasound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#2,282
of 4,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,341
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.