↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy, programmed cell death and reactive oxygen species in sexual reproduction in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Autophagy, programmed cell death and reactive oxygen species in sexual reproduction in plants
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10265-017-0934-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takamitsu Kurusu, Kazuyuki Kuchitsu

Abstract

Autophagy is one of the major cellular processes of recycling of proteins, metabolites and intracellular organelles, and plays crucial roles in the regulation of innate immunity, stress responses and programmed cell death (PCD) in many eukaryotes. It is also essential in development and sexual reproduction in many animals. In plants, although autophagy-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana show phenotypes in abiotic and biotic stress responses, their life cycle seems normal and thus little had been known until recently about the roles of autophagy in development and reproduction. Rice mutants defective in autophagy show sporophytic male sterility and immature pollens, indicating crucial roles of autophagy during pollen maturation. Enzymatic production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by respiratory burst oxidase homologues (Rbohs) play multiple roles in regulating anther development, pollen tube elongation and fertilization. Significance of autophagy and ROS in the regulation of PCD of transient cells during plant sexual reproduction is discussed in comparison with animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,050,952
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#169
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,988
of 313,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.