↓ Skip to main content

Potential drug–drug interactions with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prevalence study in France

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential drug–drug interactions with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prevalence study in France
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3291-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clément Bonnet, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Esther Azoulay-Rutman, Olivier Huillard, Jean-Louis Golmard, Edith Carton, Gaëlle Noé, Michel Vidal, Galdric Orvoen, Anne Chah Wakilian, Clémentine Villeminey, Benoit Blanchet, Jérôme Alexandre, François Goldwasser, Audrey Thomas-Schoemann

Abstract

Abiraterone acetate combined with prednisone improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. This oral anticancer agent may result in drug-drug interactions (DDI). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DDI with abiraterone and the possible determinants for the occurrence of these DDI. We performed a single centre retrospective review from electronic medical records of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone from 2011 to 2015. Potential DDI with abiraterone were identified using Micromedex and were categorized by a 4-point scale severity. Seventy-two out of ninety-five mCRPC pts (median age: 77 years [68-82]) had comorbidities. The median number of drugs used per patient was 7 [5-9]. 66 potential DDI with abiraterone were detected in 49 patients (52%): 39 and 61% were classified as major and moderate DDI, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pain (p < 0.0001), hypo-albuminemia (p = 0.032), and higher ECOG performance status (PS) (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. Pain (p < 0.0001) and PS (p = 0.018) remained significant in the multivariate analysis. Polypharmacy is an issue among mCRPC patients. In our study, half of the patients have potential DDI with abiraterone. Patients with pain and poor PS are at higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. A medication review by a pharmacist is of crucial importance to prevent DDI with abiraterone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 20 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,155,520
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#620
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,138
of 310,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.