↓ Skip to main content

An assessment of opportunities and challenges for public sector involvement in the maternal health voucher program in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
An assessment of opportunities and challenges for public sector involvement in the maternal health voucher program in Uganda
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-11-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerry Okal, Lucy Kanya, Francis Obare, Rebecca Njuki, Timothy Abuya, Teresah Bange, Charlotte Warren, Ian Askew, Ben Bellows

Abstract

Continued inequities in coverage, low quality of care, and high out-of-pocket expenses for health services threaten attainment of Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 in many sub-Saharan African countries. Existing health systems largely rely on input-based supply mechanisms that have a poor track record meeting the reproductive health needs of low-income and underserved segments of national populations. As a result, there is increased interest in and experimentation with results-based mechanisms like supply-side performance incentives to providers and demand-side vouchers that place purchasing power in the hands of low-income consumers to improve uptake of facility services and reduce the burden of out-of-pocket expenditures. This paper describes a reproductive health voucher program that contracts private facilities in Uganda and explores the policy and implementation issues associated with expansion of the program to include public sector facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 32%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 18%
Social Sciences 27 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,394,135
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#962
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,769
of 211,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.