↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTER ARTICLE: Juvenile-onset myasthenia gravis: autoantibody status, clinical characteristics and genetic polymorphisms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTER ARTICLE: Juvenile-onset myasthenia gravis: autoantibody status, clinical characteristics and genetic polymorphisms
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00415-017-8478-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Hong, Geir Olve Skeie, Paraskevi Zisimopoulou, Katerina Karagiorgou, Socrates J. Tzartos, Xiang Gao, Yao-Xian Yue, Fredrik Romi, Xu Zhang, Hai-Feng Li, Nils Erik Gilhus

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder mediated by antibodies against proteins at the neuromuscular junction. Juvenile-onset MG (JMG) has been reported to have special characteristics. It is still unclear whether there are any pathogenic and genetic differences between juvenile and adult MG. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, autoantibody status (antibodies against AChR, MuSK, LRP4, titin and RyR) and genetic susceptibility (CHRNA1, CTLA4 and AIRE) in 114 Chinese JMG patients, and compared with 207 young adult MG patients (onset age 18-40 years). JMG patients were classified into two subgroups: the very early onset group (<8 years) and puberty onset group (8-18 years). The very early onset MG patients had a higher proportion of ocular MG and thymus hyperplasia, compared with puberty onset MG and young adult MG (P < 0.05). AChR antibodies were found in majority of JMG patients and were associated with more severe disease (P < 0.05), while other antibodies were rare in JMG. Moreover, the very early onset MG had a more prominent genetic predisposition than puberty and adult MG, affecting the susceptible genes CHRNA1 and CTLA4. JMG has the same pathogenic background as adult MG, but has typical clinical features and a prominent genetic predisposition in very early onset patients (<8 years). Specific therapeutic considerations are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 10 28%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 53%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,540,642
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,682
of 4,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,341
of 309,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.