↓ Skip to main content

Combinatorial Labeling Method for Improving Peptide Fragmentation in Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Combinatorial Labeling Method for Improving Peptide Fragmentation in Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13361-017-1606-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhanuramanand Kuchibhotla, Sankara Rao Kola, Jagannadham V. Medicherla, Swamy V. Cherukuvada, Vishnu M. Dhople, Madhusudhana Rao Nalam

Abstract

Annotation of peptide sequence from tandem mass spectra constitutes the central step of mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Peptide mass spectra are obtained upon gas-phase fragmentation. Identification of the protein from a set of experimental peptide spectral matches is usually referred as protein inference. Occurrence and intensity of these fragment ions in the MS/MS spectra are dependent on many factors such as amino acid composition, peptide basicity, activation mode, protease, etc. Particularly, chemical derivatizations of peptides were known to alter their fragmentation. In this study, the influence of acetylation, guanidinylation, and their combination on peptide fragmentation was assessed initially on a lipase (LipA) from Bacillus subtilis followed by a bovine six protein mix digest. The dual modification resulted in improved fragment ion occurrence and intensity changes, and this resulted in the equivalent representation of b- and y-type fragment ions in an ion trap MS/MS spectrum. The improved representation has allowed us to accurately annotate the peptide sequences de novo. Dual labeling has significantly reduced the false positive protein identifications in standard bovine six peptide digest. Our study suggests that the combinatorial labeling of peptides is a useful method to validate protein identifications for high confidence protein inference. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#969
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,150
of 323,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#8
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.