↓ Skip to main content

Malthus in the Bedroom: Birth Spacing as Birth Control in Pre-Transition England

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Malthus in the Bedroom: Birth Spacing as Birth Control in Pre-Transition England
Published in
Demography, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13524-017-0556-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Cinnirella, Marc Klemp, Jacob Weisdorf

Abstract

We use duration models on a well-known historical data set of more than 15,000 families and 60,000 births in England for the period 1540-1850 to show that the sampled families adjusted the timing of their births in accordance with the economic conditions as well as their stock of dependent children. The effects were larger among the lower socioeconomic ranks. Our findings on the existence of parity-dependent as well as parity-independent birth spacing in England are consistent with the growing evidence that marital birth control was present in pre-transitional populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,234,914
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#328
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,274
of 321,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.