↓ Skip to main content

Fuzzy Assessment of Health Information System Users’ Security Awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Fuzzy Assessment of Health Information System Users’ Security Awareness
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10916-013-9984-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Özlem Müge Aydın, Oumout Chouseinoglou

Abstract

Health information systems (HIS) are a specific area of information systems (IS), where critical patient data is stored and quality health service is only realized with the correct use and efficient dissemination of this data to health workers. Therefore, a balance needs to be established between the levels of security and flow of information on HIS. Instead of implementing higher levels and further mechanisms of control to increase the security of HIS, it is preferable to deal with the arguably weakest link on HIS chain with respect to security: HIS users. In order to provide solutions and approaches for transforming users to the first line of defense in HIS but also to employ capable and appropriate candidates from the pool of newly graduated students, it is important to assess and evaluate the security awareness levels and characteristics of these existing and future users. This study aims to provide a new perspective to understand the phenomenon of security awareness of HIS users with the use of fuzzy analysis, and to assess the present situation of current and future HIS users of a leading medical and educational institution of Turkey, with respect to their security characteristics based on four different security scales. The results of the fuzzy analysis, the guide on how to implement this fuzzy analysis to any health institution and how to read and interpret these results, together with the possible implications of these results to the organization are provided.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,851,525
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#192
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,371
of 211,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.