| Title |
The difficult airway with recommendations for management – Part 2 – The anticipated difficult airway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-013-0020-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Adam Law, Natasha Broemling, Richard M. Cooper, Pierre Drolet, Laura V. Duggan, Donald E. Griesdale, Orlando R. Hung, Philip M. Jones, George Kovacs, Simon Massey, Ian R. Morris, Timothy Mullen, Michael F. Murphy, Roanne Preston, Viren N. Naik, Jeanette Scott, Shean Stacey, Timothy P. Turkstra, David T. Wong, for the Canadian Airway Focus Group |
| Abstract |
Appropriate planning is crucial to avoid morbidity and mortality when difficulty is anticipated with airway management. Many guidelines developed by national societies have focused on management of difficulty encountered in the unconscious patient; however, little guidance appears in the literature on how best to approach the patient with an anticipated difficult airway. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 19% |
| Spain | 4 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 82 | 26% |
| Unknown | 69 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,982,487
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#265
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,882
of 225,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.