↓ Skip to main content

Next generation sequencing as a useful tool in the diagnostics of mosaicism in Alport syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Gene, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Next generation sequencing as a useful tool in the diagnostics of mosaicism in Alport syndrome
Published in
Gene, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2013.05.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonja Beicht, Gertrud Strobl-Wildemann, Sabine Rath, Oliver Wachter, Martin Alberer, Elke Kaminsky, Lutz T. Weber, Tanja Hinrichsen, Hanns-Georg Klein, Julia Hoefele

Abstract

Alport syndrome (ATS) is a progressive hereditary nephropathy characterized by hematuria and/or proteinuria with structural defects of the glomerular basement membrane. It can be associated with extrarenal manifestations (high-tone sensorineural hearing loss and ocular abnormalities). Somatic mutations in COL4A5 (X-linked), COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes (both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant) cause Alport syndrome. Somatic mosaicism in Alport patients is very rare. The reason for this may be due to the difficulty of detection. We report the case of a boy and his mother who presented with Alport syndrome. Mutational analysis showed the novel hemizygote pathogenic mutation c.2396-1G>A (IVS29-1G>A) at the splice acceptor site of the intron 29 exon 30 boundary of the COL4A5 gene in the boy. The mutation in the mother would not have been detected by Sanger sequencing without the knowledge of the mutational analysis result of her son. Further investigation of the mother using next generation sequencing showed somatic mosaicism and implied potential germ cell mosaicism. The mutation in the mother has most likely occurred during early embryogenesis. Analysis of tissue of different embryonic origin in the mother confirmed mosaicism in both mesoderm and ectoderm. Low grade mosaicism is very difficult to detect by Sanger sequencing. Next generation sequencing is increasingly used in the diagnostics and might improve the detection of mosaicism. In the case of definite clinical symptoms of ATS and missing detection of a mutation by Sanger sequencing, mutational analysis should be performed by next generation sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#8,657
of 10,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,129
of 206,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#48
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.