↓ Skip to main content

Immune Exhaustion and Immune Senescence: Two Distinct Pathways for HBV Vaccine Failure During HCV and/or HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Immune Exhaustion and Immune Senescence: Two Distinct Pathways for HBV Vaccine Failure During HCV and/or HIV Infection
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00005-013-0219-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Q. Yao, Jonathan P. Moorman

Abstract

Given the shared risk factors for transmission, co-infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is quite common, and may lead to increases in morbidity and mortality. As such, HBV vaccine is recommended as the primary means to prevent HBV super-infection in HCV- and/or HIV-infected individuals. However, vaccine response (sero-conversion with a hepatitis B surface antibody titer >10 IU/L) in this setting is often blunted, with poor response rates to standard HBV vaccinations in virally infected individuals when compared with the healthy subjects. This phenomenon also occurs to other vaccines in adults, such as pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, in other immunocompromised hosts who are really at risk for opportunistic infections, such as individuals with hemodialysis, transplant, and malignancy. In this review, we summarize the underlying mechanisms involving vaccine failure in these conditions, focusing on immune exhaustion and immune senescence--two distinct signaling pathways regulating cell function and fate. We raise the possibility that blocking these negative signaling pathways might improve success rates of immunizations in the setting of chronic viral infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,698,262
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#207
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,878
of 287,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.