↓ Skip to main content

Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Can strategizing in round-robin subtournaments be avoided?
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00355-013-0767-6
Authors

Marc Pauly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 15%
Mathematics 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,202,464
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#56
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,663
of 209,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.