| Title |
Understanding the Central Equatorial African long-term drought using AMIP-type simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-017-3665-2 |
| Authors |
Wenjian Hua, Liming Zhou, Haishan Chen, Sharon E. Nicholson, Yan Jiang, Ajay Raghavendra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Researcher | 9 | 26% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,885,520
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,058
of 4,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,506
of 308,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#81
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.