↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of Psychological Distress and Sources of Stress and Support During Medical Training: a Survey of Medical Students

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Experiences of Psychological Distress and Sources of Stress and Support During Medical Training: a Survey of Medical Students
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40596-015-0395-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine M. Matheson, Tessa Barrett, Jeff Landine, Alan McLuckie, Nerissa Li-Weh Soh, Garry Walter

Abstract

The authors examine the prevalence of psychological distress, the stressors experienced, and the supports used by medical students and residents during their medical training at a Canadian university. This study used an online survey that included a standardized instrument to evaluate psychological distress (Kessler-10) and Likert-based survey items that examined stress levels related to family relationships, living accommodations, commuting, finances, and program requirements. Depressive symptoms, substance use, and suicidal ideation were also measured, as were supports accessed (e.g., counseling) and students' perceptions of the overall supportiveness of the university. Non-parametric descriptive statistics were used to examine the prevalence of psychological distress, sources of stress, and supports accessed. Surveys were received from 381 students (37 % response). Most students (60 %) reported normal levels of psychological distress on the K10 (M = 19.5, SD = 6.25), and a subgroup reported high to very high levels of psychological distress. A small number also reported substance use, symptoms of depression, and/or suicidal ideation. These results indicate that students experience psychological distress from a number of stressors and suggest that medical schools should act as key partners in supporting student well-being by promoting self-care, educating students on the risks of burnout, and developing programs to support at-risk students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 32%
Psychology 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,171,970
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#952
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,215
of 264,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.