| Title |
New species of sub-fossil weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in Madagascar copal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Paleontological Journal, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s003103011702006x |
| Authors |
A. Bukejs, A. A. Legalov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#138
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,557
of 308,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.