↓ Skip to main content

A Consensus Method for Ancestral Recombination Graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A Consensus Method for Ancestral Recombination Graphs
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00239-017-9786-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary K. Kuhner, Jon Yamato

Abstract

We propose a consensus method for ancestral recombination graphs (ARGs) that generates a single ARG representing commonalities among a cloud of ARGs defined for the same genomic region and set of taxa. Our method, which we call "threshold consensus," treats a genomic location as a potential recombination breakpoint only if the number of ARGs in the cloud possessing a breakpoint at that location exceeds a chosen threshold. The estimate is further refined by ignoring recombinations that do not change the local tree topologies, as well as collapsing breakpoint locations separated only by invariant sites. We test the threshold consensus algorithm, using a range of threshold values, on simulated ARGs inferred by a genealogy sampling algorithm, and evaluate accuracy of breakpoints and local topologies in the resulting consensus ARGs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,885,520
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,241
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,433
of 308,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.