↓ Skip to main content

Lower leg muscle strengthening does not redistribute plantar load in diabetic polyneuropathy: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Lower leg muscle strengthening does not redistribute plantar load in diabetic polyneuropathy: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-6-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Melai, Nicolaas C Schaper, T Herman IJzerman, Ton LH de Lange, Paul JB Willems, Valéria Lima Passos, Aloysius G Lieverse, Kenneth Meijer, Hans HCM Savelberg

Abstract

Higher plantar pressures play an important role in the development of plantar foot ulceration in diabetic polyneuropathy and earlier studies suggest that higher pressures under the forefoot may be related to a decrease in lower leg muscle strength. Therefore, in this randomised controlled trial we evaluated whether lower-extremity strength training can reduce plantar pressures in diabetic polyneuropathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Sports and Recreations 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 24 40%