↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the wind damage probability in forests in Southwestern Germany for the 1999 winter storm ‘Lothar’

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Modelling the wind damage probability in forests in Southwestern Germany for the 1999 winter storm ‘Lothar’
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0242-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk Schindler, Karin Grebhan, Axel Albrecht, Jochen Schönborn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 2 6%
Finland 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#679
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,643
of 111,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.