| Title |
Performance and economic evaluation of the molecular detection of pathogens for patients with severe infections: the EVAMICA open-label, cluster-randomised, interventional crossover trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4766-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuelle Cambau, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Stéphane Bretagne, Christian Brun-Buisson, Catherine Cordonnier, Xavier Duval, Stéphanie Herwegh, Julien Pottecher, René Courcol, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, The EVAMICA study team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Russia | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,112,034
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,061
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,222
of 327,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#59
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.