↓ Skip to main content

Visual Snow: a Potential Cortical Hyperexcitability Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Visual Snow: a Potential Cortical Hyperexcitability Syndrome
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11940-017-0448-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alaa Bou Ghannam, Victoria S. Pelak

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of visual snow (VS) and provide information regarding current treatment options for VS. Visual snow (VS) is a rare disorder manifesting with a persistent visual phenomenon of seeing numerous tiny snow-like dots throughout the visual field, and it can cause debilitating visual and psychological consequences. It is emerging as a disorder separate from, but associated with, migraine visual aura, and neuronal cortical hyperexcitability is being considered as a theoretical mechanism for the persistent-positive visual symptoms. There are few studies that have investigated the treatment of VS, but as our understanding of this entity begins to change, we expect that new treatment approaches and treatment trials will emerge in the next decade. Currently, our approach is to consider pharmacologic treatment for all patients with VS who report decreased quality of life as a result of VS. Resolution of the disorder is difficult to accomplish with treatment, but in our experience, even when symptom intensity is simply reduced, many patients find that there is an improvement in their quality of life that is beneficial. Our preferred treatment options include: (1) oral lamotrigine with a slow increase from 25 mg daily to a maintenance dose of 200-300 mg daily in divided doses as tolerated, and this is typically achieved by advancing the dose in increments of 25-50 mg weekly following the first 2 weeks of therapy; (2) oral acetazolamide with an initial dose of 250 mg daily followed by a slow increase over 1-2 weeks to a total of 1000 mg daily in divided doses, and higher doses can be tolerated by some without increasing the risk-benefit ratio; or (3) oral verapamil long-acting at 120-240 mg daily, and if side effects limit the dose the can be initiated, then lower doses with short-acting verapamil two or three times daily can be substituted until higher doses with the long-acting formula can be tolerated. By initiating drug treatments with low doses and slowly increasing over 1 to 4 weeks, tolerability and compliance improves and allows patients to realize the full benefits of treatment. The proposed mechanisms of microstructural cortical abnormalities and hyperexcitability as a cause of VS may lead to new treatment approaches in the future. Until such a time, medications reported to relieve persistent visual phenomena of migraine and visual aura of migraine are treatment options worth considering and these are reviewed for that purpose. Although clinical trials for the treatment of visual snow are lacking due to the rarity of the disorder, medications reviewed here should be considered for use in patients with VS who experience an impact on their quality of life. Theoretical mechanisms that lead to cortical hyperexcitability are being investigated and could lead to new treatment options. In the meantime, medications may provide benefits in this disabling condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 31%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,572,925
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#103
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,963
of 309,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.