You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classification and pathology of primary progressive aphasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436070.28137.7b |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Harris, Claire Gall, Jennifer C. Thompson, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones |
| Abstract |
We aimed to determine the extent to which patients with progressive language impairment conform to 2011 primary progressive aphasia (PPA) classification and to examine clinicopathologic correlations within PPA variants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 23% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 35 | 16% |
| Psychology | 22 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,189,598
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#8,137
of 21,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,428
of 224,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#57
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.