↓ Skip to main content

Dictionaries and distributions: Combining expert knowledge and large scale textual data content analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Dictionaries and distributions: Combining expert knowledge and large scale textual data content analysis
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, March 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13428-017-0875-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Garten, Joe Hoover, Kate M. Johnson, Reihane Boghrati, Carol Iskiwitch, Morteza Dehghani

Abstract

Theory-driven text analysis has made extensive use of psychological concept dictionaries, leading to a wide range of important results. These dictionaries have generally been applied through word count methods which have proven to be both simple and effective. In this paper, we introduce Distributed Dictionary Representations (DDR), a method that applies psychological dictionaries using semantic similarity rather than word counts. This allows for the measurement of the similarity between dictionaries and spans of text ranging from complete documents to individual words. We show how DDR enables dictionary authors to place greater emphasis on construct validity without sacrificing linguistic coverage. We further demonstrate the benefits of DDR on two real-world tasks and finally conduct an extensive study of the interaction between dictionary size and task performance. These studies allow us to examine how DDR and word count methods complement one another as tools for applying concept dictionaries and where each is best applied. Finally, we provide references to tools and resources to make this method both available and accessible to a broad psychological audience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 24%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 26%
Social Sciences 27 17%
Computer Science 25 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 9%
Linguistics 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,213,149
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#697
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,779
of 323,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.