You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Activated carbons derived from coconut shells as high energy density cathode material for Li-ion capacitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep03002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akshay Jain, Vanchiappan Aravindan, Sundaramurthy Jayaraman, Palaniswamy Suresh Kumar, Rajasekhar Balasubramanian, Seeram Ramakrishna, Srinivasan Madhavi, M. P. Srinivasan |
| Abstract |
In this manuscript, a dramatic increase in the energy density of ~ 69 Wh kg⁻¹ and an extraordinary cycleability ~ 2000 cycles of the Li-ion hybrid electrochemical capacitors (Li-HEC) is achieved by employing tailored activated carbon (AC) of ~ 60% mesoporosity derived from coconut shells (CS). The AC is obtained by both physical and chemical hydrothermal carbonization activation process, and compared to the commercial AC powders (CAC) in terms of the supercapacitance performance in single electrode configuration vs. Li. The Li-HEC is fabricated with commercially available Li₄Ti₅O₁₂ anode and the coconut shell derived AC as cathode in non-aqueous medium. The present research provides a new routine for the development of high energy density Li-HEC that employs a mesoporous carbonaceous electrode derived from bio-mass precursors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 23% |
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 42 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 34 | 16% |
| Engineering | 27 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 15 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,317,556
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#90,514
of 127,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,115
of 213,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#454
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.