↓ Skip to main content

Extended cognition and epistemic luck

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Extended cognition and epistemic luck
Published in
Synthese, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0267-3
Authors

J. Adam Carter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 40%
Psychology 2 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Linguistics 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,223,104
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,686
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,829
of 205,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.