| Title |
Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-009-1553-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delia Campanella, Lia Morra, Silvia Delsanto, Vincenzo Tartaglia, Roberto Asnaghi, Alberto Bert, Emanuele Neri, Daniele Regge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 58% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,149
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,324
of 91,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.