↓ Skip to main content

Cousins not twins: intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity in syndromic neuroendocrine tumours

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Pathology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cousins not twins: intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity in syndromic neuroendocrine tumours
Published in
The Journal of Pathology, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/path.4900
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aidan Flynn, Trisha Dwight, Diana Benn, Siddhartha Deb, Andrew J Colebatch, Stephen Fox, Jessica Harris, Emma L Duncan, Bruce Robinson, Annette Hogg, Jason Ellul, Henry To, Cuong Duong, Julie A Miller, Christopher Yates, Paul James, Alison Trainer, Anthony J Gill, Roderick Clifton‐Bligh, Rodney J Hicks, Richard W Tothill

Abstract

Hereditary endocrine neoplasias, including phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma and medullary thyroid cancer, are caused by autosomal dominant mutations in several familial cancer genes. A common feature of these diseases is the presentation of multiple primary tumours, or multifocal disease representing independent tumour clones that have arisen from the same initiating genetic lesion, but have undergone independent clonal evolution. Such tumours provide an opportunity to discover common co-operative changes required for tumorigenesis, while controlling for the genetic background of the individual. We performed genomic analysis of synchronous and metachronous tumours from five patients bearing germline mutations in the genes SDHB, RET and MAX. Using whole exome sequencing and high-density SNP arrays, we analyzed two to four primary tumours from each patient. We also applied multi-regional sampling, to assess intra-tumoral heterogeneity and clonal evolution, in two cases involving phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma and medullary thyroid cancer, respectively. Heterogeneous patterns of genomic change existed between synchronous or metachronous tumours, with evidence of branching evolution. We observed striking examples of evolutionary convergence involving the same rare somatic copy-number events in synchronous primary phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Convergent events also occurred during clonal evolution of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. These observations suggest that genetic or epigenetic changes acquired early within precursor cells, or pre-existing within the genetic background of the individual, create contingencies that determine the evolutionary trajectory of the tumour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,299,788
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Pathology
#2,570
of 2,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,940
of 314,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Pathology
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.