↓ Skip to main content

Post‐traumatic stress disorder and beyond: an overview of rodent stress models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post‐traumatic stress disorder and beyond: an overview of rodent stress models
Published in
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/jcmm.13161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Schöner, Andreas Heinz, Matthias Endres, Karen Gertz, Golo Kronenberg

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder of high prevalence and major socioeconomic impact. Patients suffering from PTSD typically present intrusion and avoidance symptoms and alterations in arousal, mood and cognition that last for more than 1 month. Animal models are an indispensable tool to investigate underlying pathophysiological pathways and, in particular, the complex interplay of neuroendocrine, genetic and environmental factors that may be responsible for PTSD induction. Since the 1960s, numerous stress paradigms in rodents have been developed, based largely on Seligman's seminal formulation of 'learned helplessness' in canines. Rodent stress models make use of physiological or psychological stressors such as foot shock, underwater trauma, social defeat, early life stress or predator-based stress. Apart from the brief exposure to an acute stressor, chronic stress models combining a succession of different stressors for a period of several weeks have also been developed. Chronic stress models in rats and mice may elicit characteristic PTSD-like symptoms alongside, more broadly, depressive-like behaviours. In this review, the major existing rodent models of PTSD are reviewed in terms of validity, advantages and limitations; moreover, significant results and implications for future research-such as the role of FKBP5, a mediator of the glucocorticoid stress response and promising target for therapeutic interventions-are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 281 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 95 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 78 28%
Psychology 23 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 105 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,977,226
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
#2,306
of 3,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,401
of 313,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
#46
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.