↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Effects of Mindfulness and Support and Information Group Interventions for Parents of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Other Developmental Disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Effects of Mindfulness and Support and Information Group Interventions for Parents of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Other Developmental Disabilities
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3099-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yona Lunsky, Richard P. Hastings, Jonathan A. Weiss, Anna M. Palucka, Sue Hutton, Karen White

Abstract

This study evaluated two community based interventions for parents of adults with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. Parents in the mindfulness group reported significant reductions in psychological distress, while parents in the support and information group did not. Reduced levels of distress in the mindfulness group were maintained at 20 weeks follow-up. Mindfulness scores and mindful parenting scores and related constructs (e.g., self-compassion) did not differ between the two groups. Results suggest the psychological components of the mindfulness based group intervention were effective over and above the non-specific effects of group processes and informal support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 409 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 11%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Researcher 39 10%
Other 83 20%
Unknown 108 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 152 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 8%
Social Sciences 32 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 7%
Unspecified 10 2%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 123 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,336,245
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#541
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,473
of 311,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.