↓ Skip to main content

Congo to Kalahari: data and hypotheses about the political economy of the western stream of the Early Iron Age

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, December 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Congo to Kalahari: data and hypotheses about the political economy of the western stream of the Early Iron Age
Published in
African Archaeological Review, December 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01116874
Authors

James Denbow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 12 29%
Social Sciences 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Linguistics 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#158
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,847
of 59,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them