↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive therapy for depression: Individual differences and the process of change

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive therapy for depression: Individual differences and the process of change
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, April 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01183269
Authors

Melanie J. V. Fennell, John D. Teasdale

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#657
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,354
of 12,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.