You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/fee.1472 |
| Authors |
Donald Scavia, Margaret Kalcic, Rebecca Logsdon Muenich, Jennifer Read, Noel Aloysius, Isabella Bertani, Chelsie Boles, Remegio Confesor, Joseph DePinto, Marie Gildow, Jay Martin, Todd Redder, Dale Robertson, Scott Sowa, Yu‐Chen Wang, Haw Yen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 48% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#760,314
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#267
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,670
of 323,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.